Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34300)	2/17/1999 3:13:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Most conservatives ultimately favor tax simplification, but under the current code, you are right, repeal of the marriage penalty is fairly popular. I am not sure why one should tolerate the patch work of deductions and incentives now in the code, and make a megillah out of this one item, though. I favor simplification, though.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34300)	2/17/1999 3:51:00 PM
From: cody andre	Respond to of 67261

That's blatant discrimination against "threesome" families. Do you think that the tax code should encourage menage a trois (ou quatre, whatever the case may be...)?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (34300)	2/17/1999 4:31:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 67261

Michelle. What is a"social engineering tax (or rather SE tax reduction)"? If politicians were to dismiss notions of ending the "marriage penalty" would you be satisfied, or are there other "social engineering tax reductions" you would like to see ended? I have a few more questions to ask you as part of a follow-up, but unfortunately may not be able to respond to you promptly.