Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david travis who wrote (2909)	2/17/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Yeah and how much of your "investors" hard earned comish do you pay these hos to beeen seen with you in a dark alley?

To: david travis who wrote (2909)	2/20/1999 12:37:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Careful, TRAV:"SEC Considers Controversial Plan To Combat Microcap Stock Fraud By JUDITH BURNS Dow Jones Newswires WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will consider four proposals when it meets Friday, including a controversial plan to crack down on "microcap" stock fraud by imposing tougher rules on broker-dealers who sell such stocks to the public. In the microcap area, the SEC will revisit a proposal it floated last year to combat fraud. At issue is Rule 15c2-11, adopted in 1971 to curb trading in bogus "penny" stocks. Such stocks, too small to trade on most stock exchanges, usually are listed in the National Quotation Bureau's so-called pink sheets, or the OTC Bulletin Board run by the National Association of Securities Dealers. Currently, a market maker can't begin quoting prices for an over-the-counter stock before reviewing the company's financial statements and having a reasonable basis to believe the information is accurate. Once trading begins, however, other brokers may "piggyback" onto trading without looking into the company's financial data. "There will be fewer bogus microcap stock promotions" if the SEC proposal is adopted, predicts Philip Feigin, executive director of the North American Securities Administrators Association. NASAA, which represents state securities regulators, favors the SEC's tougher approach. But securities industry professionals expressed concerns about the plan. "We're as concerned about microcap stock fraud as anyone," said George Kramer, an associate general counsel with the Securities Industry Association. But, he said the SEC's 1998 proposal would have an impact on markets other than microcap stocks, where fraud isn't prevalent. Last February, the SEC sought to toughen the rule by eliminating piggybacking and requiring all brokers who make markets in OTC securities -- not just the original market maker -- to review the information first hand, revisit it at least once a year, and refrain from publishing quotes for "questionable" stocks. "You have to make the firms put their money where their mouth is," Mr. Feigin said. "I think (this) will go a long way toward making firms responsible for the stocks they're promoting." The Securities Industry Association, Mr. Kramer said, "can live with the notion that broker-dealer monitoring plays a role here," but fears the 1998 proposal is much too broadly written. The Bond Market Association raised similar concerns, noting the changes proposed in 1998 would affect debt markets and foreign equities as well as microcap stocks. It joined others in urging the SEC to revise the plan by defining "microcap" stocks, or excluding other markets from the tougher broker-dealer rules. "It remains to be seen if they're going to refine it to deal with those concerns," said Mr. Feigin. Mr. Kramer thinks the SEC will make some changes, but isn't sure if it will add a definition, or exclude certain markets from changes it approves. In a similar vein, the SEC will consider Rule 504, which allows small companies to issue limited amounts of stock, up to $1 million, without federal registration. "There's a good side to 504" because it helps small companies tap capital markets with relative ease, said Mr. Feigin. While that is a boon for legitimate companies, it has led to fraudulent microcap offerings, thanks to what he calls the "New York loophole." That refers to the fact that all U.S. states, except New York, require state registration for stock offerings below the $1 million threshold. When the SEC loosened its small business rules in 1992, Mr. Feigin said it spurred scam artists to use a New York base to sell microcap stock under Rule 504, with no federal or state oversight. The SEC's plan is to "close that loophole" by amending Rule 504 to require that small stock offerings be registered in at least one state. "It will be a major blow against microcap fraud" if that change is adopted, Mr. Feigin said."