Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KZAP who wrote (13548)	2/17/1999 8:54:00 PM
From: MARK C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

<Well, he broke the rules in the past and was suspended, today's posts from him was really bad. I copied them, and for a fee I'll EM them to you. <ggg> He will be missed none the less. KZAP> You mean he broke the selectively enforced SI code of ethics. I think SI needs to let everyone know their agenda in their enforcement of these rules. What criteria does SI BOB use when dispensing SI justice ? Just curious how One can refer to a woman as a whore and be granted immunity from SI, just curious why SI knowingly allows Anthony to bring his entire following onto the thread of a stock they are shorting and bash the stock incessantly until everyone gets tired of the BS and sells and moves on. In my opinion it may make them a party to (whether intentional or not) the stock manipulation that these tactics truly are. The same holds true for the Hyping on many of the threads. Unless SI is able to somehow fairly and justly remedy these situations I am inclined to think GNET got screwed in their purchase of SI being as how I don't think this forum will last the long term without some serious rethinking of it's operations by management. JMHO MarkC.