SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SirVinny who wrote (102401)2/18/1999 1:08:00 AM
From: Techie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Nobody said the numbers were disastrous in and of themselves. But when put into the expected vs reality framework, they were indeed disastrous. They showed without any doubt that growth rates had seen their peak. With a p/e like Dell, you can't afford that kind of result. Any smart individual saw this coming 9 months ago, but the herd insisted on driving the price to a level where Dell's market cap was almost the size of IBM. Now go ask yourself: does Dell have anywhere near intellectual as well as physical (break up value) assets as IBM? Count the businesses IBM is in, and not as "configuration" house, but as the owners of intellectual property.

You folks could believe whatever you want, but during the coming months you will hear mutual fund managers saying "it's a buy" while they dump their shares on you all.



To: SirVinny who wrote (102401)2/18/1999 1:35:00 AM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Does it really matter whether the numbers were good or bad ? WOuld it have made any difference if DELL had reported .50 rather than .31 ? For 80% of the options to expire worthless, DELL had to be priced at 85, so the biggies found a way.....

In the end, it is all about perception. If I lose money in the high multples of 10K, I'm not going to be a happy person even if EPS is $1......