Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hcirteg who wrote (8466)	2/18/1999 8:02:00 AM
From: Chuck Lehman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

You have to like it. When was the last time VLNC issued a press release along with a patent approval?

To: hcirteg who wrote (8466)	2/18/1999 8:21:00 AM
From: john t. brice	Respond to of 27311

HC> GENTLEMAN, START YOUR ENGINES. This is so great, we are going to make a lot of money and darkside is going to evaporate from the thread!!! duckster

To: hcirteg who wrote (8466)	2/18/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

HC: Thanks for the news report. This is good news, truly it is. Now let's see how it impacts the stock valuation. One of two things can happen, an initial pop on anticipatory reaction followed by stabilization, OR no pop but a continued slow gradual rise. Why would I say that about the no pop? Oh, only that me thinks that though we longs see it as great news, those sidelines street participants may still be hanging out waiting on a truly material event, which in this case is defined as a corporate news release stating OEM approval of product based on their testing parameters, and/or CONTRACTS!! This is the true spark which will ignite the booster rocket of VLNC. Still, this news do make one look forward to 9:30am EST and onward, eh? Heh! I looooove speculating. Now let's see how it unfolds.... Regards! John~

To: hcirteg who wrote (8466)	2/18/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Dennis V.	Respond to of 27311

OK, so the phosphated cathode is likely the basis for the specs released by Hanil Valence in Oct. Looks like the performance claims made for that battery were conservative, if anything. The Korea Times published that info as received, and the claim, in its entirety, was based on real expectations, not hype, just as I expected. Pardon the muted crowing, but I'm excited; especially in view of the fact that we haven't even gotten to the "revolutionary" stuff, yet. Zeev, Valence seems to be able to manage the "generals" various priorities.