SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (5516)2/18/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 29970
 
>the FCC has made the unimaginable good decision to proceed with a free market decision ((to the chagrin of Frank), AOL has no other choice. <

Oh, I think that they have a choice they must face and make, not just AOL, but all of the ISPs, but it isn't a timely one for their near term purposes. The choice may someday face ATHM as well. To see what I'm referring to, go to:

Message 7890661

ps - we have some new company on SR. George Gilder was apparently at, or was privy to the information of, the demo. See you there.



To: ahhaha who wrote (5516)2/18/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Jing Qian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
Yes, partly agree. But AT&T just went a step quicker to have signed an alliance with TWX and talked to RR to merge with @Home. It looks like T spoiled AOL's plan. AOL may partner with SBC or US West, but how do they partner with TWX and RR? There could be a conflict of interest clause in the agreement between TWX and AT&T to forbid them to make any deal with AOL. Armstrong must have analyzed the possibility of an alliance between AOL and TWX. And he must have done something to prevent it from happening. Possible?

They are all my speculation.