Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HIGHPLANESDRIFTER who wrote (1065)	2/18/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: JHB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2003

Hey adrift, Wasn't it Shakespeare who said: "we mock that which we do not understand" JB

To: HIGHPLANESDRIFTER who wrote (1065)	2/18/1999 3:45:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 2003

Drifter, Wired did the groin kick in March of '98, shortly after the Softbank Interactive Marketing (SIM) management was fired when Zulu took over SIM. The following week both you and Jon Tara appeared to begin setting the table for Zulu, Pat Hayton and innocent investor shin-kicking duty. Check the SI record folks--go back to March. That's when JT and HPD got here. But before you do, make sure you first read the January '98 Wired article first. Quite a turnabout, huh? Yes, it's true. Jon Tara, HIGHPLANESDRIFTER and Fred Esminger have been shin-kicking, toe-stepping, venom-inducing Zulu Negheads for nearly a year now. These acts too are plainly in the SI record. And when you read over this history, you will also note my persistent objections to their behavior. How about this question, Drifter: Is there any other individual whose not in national politics, a member of the religious right, or is a movie star or famous musician, writer or whatever, whom you've never met in your life, who've you condemned as ferociously as you have Pat Hayton? Don't you even find it curious that you participate like you do? I'm appalled a man of your mind and supposed distinction could stoop so low. Don't you find your own behavior a bit appalling when it comes to Zulu? What would you say to Pat Hayton's mother were you to look her in the eye? Moreover, would you behave differently were you to look Pat Hayton in the eye? How would you feel were you to look into the eyes of all of the innocent Zulu investors, who are aware of both the pros and cons but who still believe in the company? It's a fact that these innocent Zulu investors have done nothing to harm you. Why must we withstand your daily Zulu trash act? Is it really only a mere whim, an accident--like Tradescape, Random, Bagladdy, Jon Tara and others--which compels your participation to hog up all of the space for Zulu criticism, in effect, denying this criticism to those who've actually got their money invested in this stock? Forgive me. But what you do I personally find disgusting. If you truly are concerned about investors in penny stocks, then how come we never find you posting caution to other penny stock investors? You are obviously a Zulu one-track, negative hit man and you do this at great time and expense to yourself, your family and perhaps even your career. Or has Zulu somehow become a part of your career? Indeed, it's with regret that I acknowledge I'm sick of your tainted viewpoint when it comes to Zulu. I know you have something better to offer the world. What about you: Do you think you have something better to offer world than your constant negative anti-Zulu, anti-Pat Hayton, anti-Zulu investor characterizations? More and more it looks like you, and others, are paid to trash this stock. And if this is so, how can I complain--because it's your job. Thus it merely becomes our misfortune that we have to put up with your anticisms. Personally, I would prefer a clean, wholesome, honest and very analytical discussion about Zulu. But the crowd you hang with in this debate will never allow it.