Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich Dee who wrote (28394)	2/18/1999 1:08:00 PM
From: Frank Brisebois	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

rich "For the other pure Y2K stocks, like Alydaar Software (ALYD) and Tava Technologies (TAVA), it simply isn't likely that there will be any tremendous revenue boom from this point forward." Well Boys/Girls, there you have it. In a nutshell due to lack of good management PRing, this is the reward we get. Has anyone passed this tid-bit on to JJ et all. Frank

To: Rich Dee who wrote (28394)	2/18/1999 2:57:00 PM
From: JDN	Respond to of 31646

Dear Rich dee; Briefing.com knows very well TAVA is not a pure y2k play. They attended a meeting about a year ago in which TAVA participated. At that meeting JJ being the boy scout that he is, volunteered to them that AFTER y2k was over revenues would drop although he said something like the base would be higher than originally. Well, they took that and reported that TAVA would return to original volume (something like 37mm a year). then after awhile they repeated it. At the time, we were pissed that they MISREPORTED the original meeting and pissed at JJ for even making such a statement. NO ONE could have known then what revenue might be 2-3 years later and as it turns out NO ONE contemplated everything that has happened since which completely negates his comment and theirs was false to begin with. If anyone here is STUPID ENOUGH to be paying Briefing.com money to listen to their bullshit which I have found to more WRONG then RIGHT feel free to send them this post in its entirety. JDN