SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (73950)2/18/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, I wasn't talking about Intel's segmentation strategy. I was simply making a comment after reading your missive on 'purchasing decisions'! Besides, we all know that Intel has been 'sensitized' to the marketplace and now has the 'right' Celerons in place. On a more serious note, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't concerned about Celeron eating away at the higher end chips. From what I read, a 400mhz Celeron is pretty close to a 400mhz PII in performance. It is also enough power for most to do what they need. Maybe that changes when fat pipes are more widespread. That will still be awhile though. On a less serious note, is Mikey still your 'idol'??? <ggg>

Regards,
John



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (73950)2/18/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,

For now, 2 or 3 sec differences are huge. later on .2 or .3 secs will seem just as huge.

Recently I have been finding the typical SI latency to be between 5 and 60 seconds. This is very irritating. Which CPU should I buy to speed this up?

Scumbria


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News