Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris land who wrote (2210)	2/18/1999 5:20:00 PM
From: Pied Piper	Respond to of 2489

I guess you don't have much of a sense of humour. If you take everything you read "as read", then you can't be expected to make too many intelligent decisions in this world. I'm sorry if you are offended by they way I "speak". I tend not to pull punches and if this bothers you then I suggest you ignore my posts. BTW, what was offensive about the post to which you responded today? In that one I simply stated in detail my experience with PFRM. OK, I called it a turkey. Do you want to kill me for that! I call it such mainly because I am mad at myself for allowing myself to be sucked in by the hype. I take full responsibility for being sucked in, BTW, but it doesn't make me any less upset with myself. My whole point, which you either don't get or choose to ignore (am I being nasty?), is that we all owe it to ourselves to check out every piece of information concerning a stock we are in or are considering. If we only listen to those who support our current belief system on it, then we will never be alerted to warning signals. That's what I continually see on this thread. Witness all the rationalization that the CFOs resignation was a good thing! Also, the repeated gushing over the "partnership" agreements with MSFT and LCOS, when they clearly were no such thing. There you have it. You may call it nasty, I call it playing them as I see them. PP