Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : WWS.T World Wide Minerals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: traacs who wrote (672)	2/18/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 784

Quite encouraging that usecc got a settlement from the same outfit - #reply-7886329

To: traacs who wrote (672)	2/19/1999 12:01:00 AM
From: Nicholas Rainford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 784

When WWS applied for a uranium export license to the United States, the Kazakhstan government had to refuse because Nukem already had sole exclusive export rights for that country. So WWS secured a contract in Taiwan, which was also refused export- WHY? You guessed it, Nukem had sole exclusivity. IMPORTANT- How many other countries does Nukem sole exclusivity too??? A court injunction against Nukem to export uranium from Kazakhstan? Could happen. A few posts ago, I wrote kazakhstan exported $250 million a year in uranium, HUH WRONG - I got it out of a report that was originally published in Russian then translated to english- sorry about that. But, for the last 6 years Kazakhstan has exported USD$17 to $25 million of uranium each year. Except for the 1997 year which seemed to have increased uranium export sales to over $50 million, wonder why? I agree with Klaas; of a greater upside in price. Also, Nukem just lost an appeal (against USU) a few weeks ago in a U.S. court. WWS with an out of court settlement, I'll put my money on it.