Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (50053)	2/18/1999 7:01:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 1580212

Pravin, If proven guilty, Intel could face paying a damage award the size of which has never been seen before. Wahoooooooo!!!!!!! Intel's violations of the intent of the antitrust laws have been remarkably blatant. Scumbria

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (50053)	2/18/1999 7:28:00 PM
From: greg nus	Respond to of 1580212

Prav, mabee paul was right AMd might be one hell of a lottery ticket, should Intel be compeled to pay AMD

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (50053)	2/18/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580212

<The FTC is finally getting their investigation of Intel headed in the right direction:> Translation: The FTC's case looks rather weak at the moment, so they now focus on the Celeron price war. Seems like a dead-end street to me. Not only does the FTC have to prove that Intel is selling Celeron below cost, which is difficult enough, but the FTC also has to prove that AMD's troubles weren't self-inflicted. Tenchusatsu