Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (50069)	2/18/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: RDM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

<You will > From what I have heard. Merced is still a question. You may see it but you may wish you waited however long McKinley will take.

To: Elmer who wrote (50069)	2/18/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Elmer - RE: "You betcha they are. Even more so than K7 because regardless of it's production worthiness, the K7 clearly exists and has been seen. Anyone seen a Coppermine or a Merced? You will but until then they are Vapor." My gosh Elmer, you have pretty strict guidelines. You must be the only person on this thread who thinks the K7 and Coppermine are vaporware, in your opinion. I think Merced may be vaporware, not because it doesn't exist, but because it may eventually evaporate in favor of McKinley.