Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.Austin who wrote (13899)	2/18/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90042

ROFLMAO go look at the posts I keep responding to little yipping junkyarddawg's is the funniest so far though Dawg you better talk to an attorney about the costs of legal action when you are not a lawyer I stated the questions that I want answered it is simple and direct there is one side (Tim) saying SI permanently banned him and another side (SI) saying SI did not permanently ban him and he asked to be removed case closed until he answers the questions quit posting to me notice there were no posts from me tonight until dawg started in on me quit having dawg wave around his little legal threats