Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MIKFREE who wrote (13926)	2/19/1999 4:43:00 AM
From: puborectalis	Respond to of 90042

Growth at Cisco Systems (CSCO) or Lucent Technologies (LU), for example, doesn't depend at all on growth at Dell or other PC companies. HOLD THESE WINNERS FOR THE NEXT LEG OF THIS BULL MARKET. tHROW IN sunw AND intc FOR A CHASER.

To: MIKFREE who wrote (13926)	2/19/1999 6:57:00 AM
From: SHGLaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90042

And the past day of worthless posts instigated by Lisa, now one A@P's flock but an annoying child as long as she's been around here, are precisely why SI has had its day. The ironies of her coming to Tim's thread to deliberately disrupt things are many, as she is part of the cabal that has done the same thing, except with threats of legal action, if people go on A@P's thread and challenge them. The difference, of course, is that when people go there, it's usually been because some A@P people spammed some stock thread after a short has been announced. Unless you enjoy spending your days arguing about nonsense with 3 year olds, it's time to find a new home in a better neighborhood. I wonder if this thread will be filled with such silliness again today, and consequently devoid of anything useful. People, Lisa didn't change her name to secret agent whatever to demonstrate her maturity. Why allow her to dictate you day? This was one of Tim's mistakes too, as he was always one to fight these pointless battles. And it never served any purpose for him either. SHG

To: MIKFREE who wrote (13926)	2/19/1999 9:18:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

No you will not post me again and if you do there will be ramifications Trust me on that..definitely from me if not SI I am now contacting Bob concerning your posts You have already had one post deleted by SI I REPEAT DO NOT POST ME WITH YOUR BS AGAIN NO MAKE THAT DO NOT POST ME PERIOD I have a legitimate question concerning Tim Luke's activity PERIOD I am waiting for an explanation concerning his permanent ban and do not care to get repeated posts from people on this subject all day long and all night long to which I have to respond I do not care to get yipping Junkyarddawg's threats of a lawsuit because trust me he doesn't have enough money to mess with me...that is pretty obvious by the attempt to extort money from SI for him and MANY people behind the scenes have questions as well concering Luke's activities.... as SI can verify themselves In my opinion HE LIED PERIOD You do not find a post from me attacking you, do you?????? but your posts are filled with BS Now, if you want to laud a person who tries to extort money out of SI do it to someone else.