To: im a survivor who wrote (328 ) 2/19/1999 11:34:00 AM From: T A P Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 582
Well said KG4...I did make a mistake by directly locking horns with the adversaries on this thread and will not waste my time or yours again. This thread had only 2 or 3 posts just 8 days ago before T A P selected SOWK now 330 of which probably half were bash and counter bash in content and had no real value as far as the company SOWK is concerned.T A P tries to find good companies with a lot of potential and we are on the shareholders side 100%,just go back to last Friday when we saw SOWK did not open at what T A P thought should be the adjusted dividend price we posted an alert of caution here and emailed all our members to consult their brokerage and call SOWK before buying. Unfortunately not all shareholders are T A P members and ironically non-shareholders go out of their way to throw stones at us and will post anything at everyones expense especially the shareholders, as bashing and trashing T A P can only have a negative effect on the stock. That is why I felt compelled to respond to all the negative posts and personal attacks, which only fanned the flame as we found out!To avoid this T A P is considering only posting news on the threads from now on and answering questions via email but have not made a final decision on this yet. For now we have decided not to directly respond to posters that degrade,lie, mislead,slander with the type of libelous posts we have been subject to this past week. So to all concerned, as T A P stated in last post do your own research and don't make decisions based on what you read here.Also SI has told T A P it is against Terms of Use, although I don't see it listed, that we can not post our URL any longer.... amazing isn't it,posters who clearly violate paragraph B are allowed to post freely and T A P now has to tell people who want to join to click on screenname and go to T A P profile to get our URL.Boggles the mind don't it !