SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : El Misti Gold Limited (EMG V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JAS who wrote (366)2/19/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: robert b  Respond to of 513
 
sometimes its more than just grams per ton ...
depth, geography, frequency , economics, no of holes tested... ?



To: JAS who wrote (366)2/20/1999 8:10:00 AM
From: wes  Respond to of 513
 
jas-- that 55.09 is silver not gold you cant compare oranges to apples or 55.09 g/ton silver to 1.61 g/ton gold --accually you can rule of thumb is approx 40 to 1 .wes



To: JAS who wrote (366)2/21/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: George Castilarin  Respond to of 513
 
Those are very significant results! The numbers are not as high, but then how fully understood is this system, and what about a silver credit?



To: JAS who wrote (366)2/21/1999 8:29:00 PM
From: charred  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 513
 
JAS, these numbers are confusing. ARP is Au and Ag. Sinchao is Au,Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn. To use Au equivalents with all those base metals is dishonest. Management should know better. You can't compare ARP and EMG. ARP is in a different league than old El Misti.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News