To: Lhn5 who wrote (20829 ) 2/22/1999 1:43:00 AM From: Kerry Lee Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
<< KL--The last 3 posts seem to say a lot more about you than about me. Unfortunately, I didn't save the email from you that solicited my 'help' in hyping ANCR on the Tokyo Mex board. Maybe you never recovered from me turning yuo down for ethical reasons.>> Larry, if you are who you claim to be, I got home in time to see my Sonics beat your LA Lakers.. Larry/Terer/Lane/Ed or whoever, I must say that your posts are becoming increasingly "slick" and increasingly articulate as compared to previous posts as "Larry Newman" ..your true identity/personality is coming to the surface. As you may recall in my e-mail request to you( and others) last year, I asked a few people as a favor to send private messages to lobby Tokyo Joe and ask him to look into ANCR as a possible stock pick. There was no such request to you or anyone else to start posting on the Tokyo Joe board and "hype" ANCR. The reason I made the personal request is because he has the "juice" to bring in the high trading volume and help ANCR break through technical resistance of 9 1/8 ( 52 week high ). I sent him a private SI message in early December to do some DD on ANCR and he never even bothered to respond.That was my one and only message to him. I did not send him a follow-up message telling him how rude and annoying he was for not responding because the guy probably gets 100's of em's a day and doesn't know me from Adam. I have no problem with his non-responsiveness, especially since I have never done him any favors. Quid Pro Quo. Rather than sending him follow-up messages, I felt that if several different people sent him a private heads-up on ANCR, then he would take it more seriously, ie. like a write-in campaign. My recollection is that I also sent e-mail requests to both George Dawson and KJ Moy. If anyone else here got similar requests, feel free to interject. My recollection is that George declined and KJ took it upon himself to make one single post on the Tokyo Joe board. When you posted that I solicited you to "hype" ANCR, that is a baldfaced lie.Do you also have a problem with people sending e-mail to CNBC to look at certain stocks? How do you think stocks get on shows like Squawk Box or Taking Stock? Are you really that naive? I think you're just slick. VERY SLICK.Otherwise, why would you ask such lame questions and elicit such a vocal "sigh" of disappointment on the conference call? Why ask me( an anonymous person from the Internet whom you have never met or even spoken to) about OEMs in a private e-mail after the conference call when you had a golden opportunity to ask very specific questions to Ancor mgmt about OEM's? I see, you put MORE weight into rumors/info from the Internet than from information obtained directly from the Company. That makes ALOT of sense. Get your facts straight. Feel free to post your best recollection of my "request", what your definition of "ethical" is and what your understanding of "Quid Pro Quo" is. What is your own definition of "hype"? PS - I now see that some people have complained about low trading volume on ANCR. I got a message recently from someone who compares the recent trading on ANCR to watching paint dry, yet that same person was also against inviting any of the Tokyo Jow crowd to the party. Some people want to have their cake and eat it too. If you don't want the volatilty, then don't expect to see the volume/liquidity either.