Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCH Technologies (DCH) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (634)	2/19/1999 10:28:00 AM
From: Alan Brezin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2513

Sid and All, Less talk and more walk! I wrote the IR dept as Steve suggested and put the burden of proof on them. Read below the letter I wrote them then email them to affirm the need for an authoritative reply from them on these issues. I expect everyone to affirm by emailing the company as I wrote them you would do! To Whom it can be fulfilled: I would like to bring to light the inconsistency of cost of goods being represented as less than the material cost in recent financial statements of the company as represented by Sid Turtlman to the shareholder followers on the investment discussion threads. How can that be? Also, who is Anteus and do they already have the bridge inspection contracts awarded and how strong are their bridge inspection contracts therefore how likely are they to follow through on their reported, per news release by DCHT, purchase of sensors from DCHT? I am a 2000 shares shareholder of DCHT seeking to illuminate the discussion threads to the real facts. If you read them you will see that I have been defending the company so far against attacks from Sid Turtlman. Give me some consistent and factual ammunition, please. There is a natural concern that the company's reports of contracts and business customers and alliances are exaggerations, name dropping and fluff and more seriously, that the company's finances are mismanaged and near the brink of disaster. IMO, the shareholders expect this public company to be honest and not exaggerate the positive nor minimize the negative and I am not implying that it hasn't. A forthcoming answer to these questions would be a very positive gesture to the concerned shareholders and strong sign of the company's integrity, imo. I will post a copy of this letter to the threads and hope that other shareholders e-mail you at DCHTinvest@aol.com to affirm these sentiments. Yours very truly, Alan Brezin