To: T A P who wrote (344 ) 2/20/1999 6:29:00 PM From: T A P Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 582
Below is T A P's response to the email SI Admin (Bob) sent to us in regards to certain posts, still, in his opinion are not in Violation with SI Terms of Use. Of course SI disclaimers say it is up to SI to determine when and if Terms of Use are being violated etc.. I have included here Paragraph B in Terms of Use. B. You agree not to use the service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortious, improper or otherwise objectionable, or that infringes or may infringe the intellectual property or other rights of another. I ask all SI posters to read posts listed below and give your honest opinion whether these posts were any of the things listed above in Paragragh B,then email your replies to T A P & SI. To SI Admin (Bob) Please give me the addresses of all upper management of SI. I would like a 2nd , 3rd and 4th opinion on the posts in question from SI personel, CEO, V.P., Managers, etc....obviously your not the person to speak to about violations as these posts # 100, 213, 238, 240, 267, 291 on SOWK to name a few, are clearly a violation of your terms of use. Your ability to interpret them as violations is very questionable and I intend to take this to vote amongst the posters of SI. For you to hide behind SI disclaimers does not make it right and will not hold up amongst the moral majority who pay for your service and expect violations of Terms of Use to be dealt with in a fair and prompt manner. I will be posting this response on certain threads immediately to let SI members be aware of this situation.