SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ted David who wrote (3380)2/20/1999 12:33:00 AM
From: Math Junkie  Respond to of 15132
 
We find that some of those perma-bears provide great entertainment!



To: Ted David who wrote (3380)2/20/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: marc ultra  Respond to of 15132
 
Ted, since you posted here I'm curious. do you get to listen to Brinker on the weekends? One thing I appreciate is after thousands of times they now let you guys mention GE without having to combine it with "parent of this network". Keep up the good work

Marc



To: Ted David who wrote (3380)2/20/1999 6:42:00 AM
From: Boca_PETE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
Ted D: Last night on PBS nightly biz report, your former associate (Suzie Garab) interviewed perma bear Bill? Fleckenstein. At the end of the interview, she recounted Fleck's poor record and asked if he had any comment to those followers who would have missed the huge rise in the market since he went bearish. THIS IS THE QUESTION THAT SHOULD BE ASKED OF YOUR PERMA BEAR GUESTS every time they appear on TV. Fleck's response was pure comedy - now that's entertainment. "Oh, there's a difference between not making money and not losing money" he said nonsensically.

One gets the impression that CNBC does not track the record of its market guru guests. It should and it should hold that record up in their faces every time they appear on TV. Then viewers could understand the quality of the predictions they are hearing and consider the source. THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE CNBC is compelled to reflect BALANCE (for some unknown reason), rather than reflecting accuracy (being on the right side of the market.

P



To: Ted David who wrote (3380)2/20/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 15132
 
Ted: Re: "And if we DON'T put on some bears to balance it all out, we get flack for that too!!!!!!!! Can't win!"

Yes, and I look to CNBC for balance. Why I look forward to the reports from Renay San Miguel and Amanda Grove from the NASDAQ site when Applied Materials has been active. It is then that I learn the true meaning of balance when they sometimes tell me that Applied Materials is a leading chip making company. I, of course, am of the opinion that Applied makes chip making equipment but it is good to hear a contrary viewpoint. Accuracy should never get in the way of balance. Fortunately, here in the alternative media of threadom we don't have to care about balance. We just want to get it right.



To: Ted David who wrote (3380)2/22/1999 9:44:00 PM
From: Lars  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
Ted,

>>>
And if we DON'T put on some bears to balance it all out, we get flack for that too!!!!!!!! Can't win!

-td
>>>

Balance? Yeah right.

I have to say that CNBC was a great contrary indicator for me during last year's correction. Super Bearish at the precise time everyone should have been buying. There's some balance.

Then again, who needs that when you have the Starship Commander saying.....

To: don lane (1674 )
From: don lane Thursday, Oct 15 1998 6:41PM ET

Here is my favorite quote from last weekend's radio show:

"I am Bob Brinker.........and I am here........and I am bullish!

And as they say, the rest is history!