To: chalu2  who wrote (1 ) 3/2/1999 2:12:00 AM From: Jimbostein     Read Replies (1)  | Respond to    of 6  
More on BPON: Here's some follow up regarding your recent questions: I spoke with Steve Schorr on late last week.  Please excuse getting this out now, but I've been swamped at work.  He said that September 30, 1998 financials were available from the company, but at this point they were not audited.  Evidently there will be a small loss per share.  (I don't recall the exact figure, but feel free to call the company.)   I then asked him about whether or not the company was planning to release audited financials.  He stated that they were, and that Berg & Company of San Francisco would be doing the audit of their 12/31/98 financials.   Evidently, he thought that such information should filed with the SEC in a few months. (Making them fully reporting.)  He also confirmed that their controller/CEO was from a large corporate and Big Six (Coopers & Lybrand) background.   (This gives them a head start in knowing how to report their financials on a GAAP basis, JMHO.) When I asked him about market makers, he stated that they had 10 of them.  I requested a list, and it did show 10 MM's.  I'm sure the company would fax it to you as well, if you're interested in seeing who they are. I asked him some more about the poor showing since the IPO last fall.  His response was that they got off to a week start due to a very poor promoter, and lack of interest in the stock at that time.  (I guess there wasn't enough news to peak anyone's interest in light of the Internet stock craze, IMHO.)  I asked him about the issue of promotion and he stated that the stock would be promoted mainly by the showing of results on their operations.  And that as is usually the case, the market will respond to positive earnings and growth.  (He seemed confident that the results would soon speak for themselves, as delivery of the Zinc sulfate monohydrate begin, and when the accelerate due to the "ramping up to full production" after the current "optimization phase".   (Evidently they are fine-tuning the process so that within a few weeks production would be at full capacity, which I believe is 5 tons per day. )  He also stated that the drying process, (the recycling process extracts zinc in a liquid stateā¦) was the "slow step", but that they are purchasing another dryer, which should allow for significantly higher production. To address your concern about "other metal recycling companies that have gone nowhere issue."   Perhaps you have a point, but according to Mr. Schorr this company has a unique patented process, which sets it apart from its predecessors.  Namely, it can both extract valuable minerals, like zinc, copper, chrome and cadmium; while at the same time IT CAN DECONTAMINATE AND PURIFY THE WATER IT USES IN THE PROCESS!  This provides the advantage of being both profitable, and pro-environmental.  Make your own conclusion, but in my mind this is the key.  I think that governments at every level will be knocking on the doors of this company to clean up many of their environmental problems.  All the while they will be giving the company free minerals, which once separated using MR3 will be theirs to sell! Lastly I asked him if they planned on expanding the operation outside of Montana.  (For the MR3 extraction part of the business.)  He couldn't give me any details, but mentioned that they (the company) were currently involved in exploring opportunities in Taiwan and India. .