Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 3:01:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

I'd like to see all these rape victims run me off. They all had better have waited 20 years to accuse though. I'm not answering to any rape victims that go to the police immediately; get check out at a hospital and protect the evidence. Any of them that don't do anything except wait to accuse for 20 years; I'll be happy to deal with them.

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 3:22:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

"When Jones's attorneys first subpoenaed her in their sexual harassment lawsuit against the president, Broaddrick swore out an affidavit and testified in a deposition that Clinton did not make unwelcome sexual advances toward her in the late 1970s."

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 3:25:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

"Rogers's family had its own unusual experience with Clinton that could affect her view of him. As governor in December 1980, he commuted the life sentence of a man, Guy L. Kuehn, who had killed Rogers's father, Ray Trentham, a school custodian, during a robbery." The plot thickens; here is the motive to lie about all of this. DD; you've never been a police officer have you. Every crimnal you put away seems to try to pin something on you at some point later on. You work in the public and you make enemies and they try to get even any unscrupulous way they can. After all; they're jailbirds and you put them away.

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 3:28:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

"At the time, both Dave and Juanita Broaddrick were married to other people, but having an affair."; This woman is an upstanding and moral individual. Why would we doubt her honesty?

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 3:33:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

"I was very angry but there was nothing I could do," he said yesterday. "I was put in a very helpless situation. If it happened today, it wouldn't matter who it was, I would confront it. At the time I was not able to because of my personal situation and I have to live with that."; Now this makes sense; she was just violently raped; what could she do? There was nothing she could do. I guess the phone wasn't working; she didn't have a dime in her pocket. And she was helpless. The injury on her lip made it impossible for her to talk with out mild pain; how could she endure telling the story to the police and bear the pain of her swollen lip? Her personal situation was the issue; she was too busy with dealing with cheating on her husband and worrying about her boyfriend's wife finding out about her. How could any woman report a rape with all that on her mind?

To: DD™ who wrote (34619)	2/20/1999 2:31:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey DD! Your reply to John Doe, #34619, was the same exact response that I got from you on the "Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?" thread, note # 11777. So, you wrote a note with very weak points, that you seem quite proud of, for some reason, and you insert nasty insults into the note, and then you copy it all over the place! <g> In your much copied note you ask: "How stupid can you be"? This might be a good question for you to ask yourself! <g>