Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBL who wrote (34628)	2/20/1999 3:35:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

Why was Clinton impeached for everything BUT rape; Ken Starr had all of this after all months and months and months ago. Why is it so important that the American people have the story? The Republican's don't care about polls after all? Why why why why why didn't they use this; it is so clearly true true true true!!!!!!!!

To: JBL who wrote (34628)	2/20/1999 3:40:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

If you read the article that is on the front page of the Washington Post in full; you might see why Ken Starr, the Republican's and now the American people aren't going to do anything with this information. Like I say; if a second impeachment isn't launched; all of you have to ask; why not. It is your people still in the majority in the House. You MUST demand of all your Republican House representatives that they put forward a second impeachment on this. If they won't; you should punish them by voting against them; throw the bums out. These are your represenatives and after all; this is rape we are talking about; not some small matter like perjury or obstruction of justice. Frankly; I'm furious at the Republican's; the had this and didn't even use it. What was the House doing???? Why didn't they put this out; they had the power to release it??????

To: JBL who wrote (34628)	2/20/1999 3:56:00 AM
From: Gary E. Johnson	Respond to of 67261

<Gee; why did the Republican's sit on this till after the impeachment?????? Man that is the question!!!!!!! They had it after all. Why why why??????> Perhaps this part of a letter will answer the question: "Specifically, a key Senator in the Republican leadership was confronted with being "outed" as to his past sexual improprieties and business dealings. The sexual information was leaked only partially to the media, but the unfortunate business information was held more closely to the vest. We have learned this from this Senator's family and friends. Another Republican Senator was held in check by information the President had on his huge outstanding gambling debts. Additionally, family members of certain Senators were given federal jobs by the President in order to influence their votes. There has been news reportage of the jobs. Other Senators were also improperly pressured to violate their solemn trial oath "to do impartial justice." All of this jury tampering, both the threats and the rewards, violates federal criminal statute Title 18, Section 1505, which punishes anyone, including the President, who "corruptly, or by threats…endeavors to influence…either House…of the Congress."