To: Ruyi who wrote (10231 ) 2/20/1999 9:01:00 AM From: RG Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
I believe the company Internet Liquidators and BII are one and the same, just a name change to represent a more positive futuristic business approach. Why are you proposing that the former company still exists as a separate entity? As far as BII appearing on the Nasdaq, all Internet companies are different, therefore BII should be compared to other Internet companies on the Nasdaq with which it has something in common, such as Ebay and Ubid. As I said in one of my earlier posts, Ubid received a huge pop and went up to $175 a share, stayed there for a few weeks and gradually went down under a $100.00. If you had studied Ubid's financials I wonder to what stock price you would have said that company's stock would soar. BII's future pop on the Nasdaq will depend on: 1. The present condition of the market 2. The public's awareness of this stock (if the company does not announce and promote on CNBC and U.S. publishings, and investors are unaware of it, then BII may go unnoticed)If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, does that mean it didn't fall? I hope, everyone who has good intentions for BII, sends an e-mail to Godin or Richardson suggesting they make themselves highly visible to the U.S. investors before and after the Nasdaq listing! This is so important! Investors are still out there in large numbers waiting for a new play. If BII is smart in promoting this stock, they will advertise on CNBC their presence on the Nasdaq,and advertise in many publications widely read by U.S. investors the Nasdaq listing, their unique sports cards(which are unheard of unless you happen to be on their Web site), and all information about their company to promote it. I have Aol. I do extensive research on information about many companies. Every company posts information(however small or trivial it may seem) to boost it's stock price, so I strongly dissagree with your previous attacks on BII for posting information. Should they withhold this from the public or wait until people accidentally stumble upon a new product on their web site? If you were the CEO of a company, would you not release information about any new product or service you are providing? Would you not release any future project on which you are working to the public to boost your market share and image? This once again leads me to question your company bashing. My question to you has gone unanswered as to why you want to destroy this company. This company can't do anything right in your eyes. I would think that you would want the stock to go as high as possible (didn't you say you were long) so you could make money also.(may I am being presumptuous and you really don't need any extra money)!LOL Keep it civil, Doug. I'm not into personal destruction! RG