Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary E. Johnson who wrote (34646)	2/20/1999 4:22:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

"From my standpoint, I think it was appropriate behavior on our part," Hutchinson said. They never pressed to include the Broaddrick allegation in the trial, he added, because "it would have been wrong to throw out something pejorative to the president and not probative to the issues involved."; Now this makes sense; why would you want to throw out something pejorative about the President; after all; he is just a perjurer, a liar, and an obstructor of justice, but God knows; we don't want to say anything pejorative about him. Thank you Asa for explaining this to all of us.

To: Gary E. Johnson who wrote (34646)	2/20/1999 4:26:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

"Juanita has never been in control of this story," Dave Broaddrick said yesterday. "She told it when she has had to in legal situations. This is the first time, under no pressure, she has been able to be in control of the story since it happened, and that's a refreshing place to be."; I wonder what the definition of control is? After all; when you tell the story under oath; what control do you have; you have to tell the truth, but then she lied under oath, but what does that matter; what would that matter???????? It is how she tells it when she is paid to tell it by the media; that's when you have control over the thing.

To: Gary E. Johnson who wrote (34646)	2/20/1999 4:29:00 AM
From: Johnathan C. Doe	Respond to of 67261

Looking back, Juanita Broaddrick said yesterday that she does not believe she made a mistake by keeping quiet in 1978 but wishes she had come forward in 1992. "I feel that had I come out in '92, that it may have made a difference," she said. "I regret that." As for going public now, she said, "I feel like I have gotten the biggest weight off my shoulders. I did it because of my twin granddaughters -- they're 12. . . . When they ask me about this in a few years, I want them to say, 'That was a neat thing you did.' I didn't want them asking me, 'Why didn't you come forward?' "; I guess if you come forward; it really doesn't matter WHEN to the children. After all; all the children will want to know is; Grandma, could you write me a check for college, could you buy me a car for Christmas; gee Grandma, thank you for coming forward.