SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (34732)2/20/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: MacCoy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Your point that Clinton doesn't deserve our support as President for so many reasons, is legitimate. My choice is not to take him out on a charge I think is wrong...wrong in many ways.
This is my area and issue of interest; Clinton's other activities haven't stirred me much.
<<Sorry, I don't think I was quite clear. My use of the term "agency" in "<we have no agency able to maintain a standard of truth...>" was meant as an verb. As in agency of principle. That is a method of practically applying principle to our lives and the society that we are enculturated by and enculturating for our progeny.>> I don't get your point. We should have some way of knowing the truth? beyond knowing the truth individually? We should agree on truth, as an issue? like in voting a candidate?



To: one_less who wrote (34732)2/20/1999 6:55:00 PM
From: nuke44  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
"Americans like to talk about (or be told about) Democracy but, when put to the test, usually find it to be an inconvenience. We have opted instead for and authoritarian system disguised as Democracy. We pay through the nose for an enormous government, accountable to no one and then wonder how those assholes got in there."

-Frank Zappa

I think Frank described us and our President to a T.



To: one_less who wrote (34732)2/21/1999 4:50:00 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
Geez Breez, now that was just a fantastic statement! :-) EOM



To: one_less who wrote (34732)2/21/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Respond to of 67261
 
>Your enemy, brees<

LOL! Hahahaha. Nice post, brees.