Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (50277)	2/21/1999 1:41:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580430

Pal, <You idiot. I'm smart enough to know that 2.3 is larger than 2.2 and that NO MATTER WHAT THE OXIDE THICKNESS, the ELECTRIC FIELD ACROSS THE OXIDE, measured in Volts/Angstrom, is going to be HIGHER for 2.3 volts than for 2.2 volts.> You are smart? Enough?? Answer me a simple question: Let a 2.0-process has a breakdown voltage of, say, 2.5V, and a 2.3-process has a breakdown voltage of, say, 3.0V, which device has operating voltage close to "breakdown"? Idiot, you said himself: field is Volts/Angstrom, therefore the field is SMALLER for thicker oxide. I told you, if you do not know the oxide thickness, shut up. Why should I tell you, a "Ph.D.", these ELEMENTARY things? Your Ph.D should be revoked long time ago. As I always recommend you: go woodworking, you forgot EVERYTHINHG in science during your "happy" retirement (and looking at your professional achievents at Intel, you never knew all it).