Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raye Derickson who wrote (2936)	2/21/1999 1:03:00 PM
From: geoffreycs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Raye, The market cap of a company should be based on the quality of its assets, not on how much it is hyped or trashed. Investors should focus on these assests and not speculative opinions of the poorly informed. When a company claims to have a large rich deposit of gold in a very unusual enviorment(cinder cone) then the veracity of these claims should be carefully scrutinized by investors. There are a number of indepentent experts who could verify the claims of MGAU. In my opinion such a indepentent study should be carried out and funded by MGAU. Cost would not be great. What have they to loss. If the results confrim the companies claims then the company has gained alot more credibility which should hlep their share price a great deal and thus the investors. If their claims are proved to be false then less money will be spent on assets of no value and more investment will be avalible on things which have a real chance of creating real wealth.