Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the gator who wrote (2115)	2/21/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

I thought you said you were leaving? How can we miss you if you won't go away? hehehehehe JLA

To: the gator who wrote (2115)	2/21/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2390

Hi gator. On this used underwear thing.... I never knew why people kept bringing this up. Then I went to a tax seminar and the accountant told us that Clinton was dinged for deducting $4. instead of $2. for "underwear" on his taxes... she then went on to explain... There is a book called "cash for your used clothing" that lists all deductions allowed by the IRS for any number of items (not just clothes). If you are prudent in your deductions, you will get a box of used clothes together and take them down to Goodwill every year. The Goodwill people then make a list of what you have in there, the category and what it is worth as a service to you! You, the donator do not do this - they do. There are a lot of items that fall under the "underwear" category... socks for example and some nighties and stuff. So Clinton took a bunch of clothes to goodwill and they misassigned $4. instead of $2. on his donation list (which was then transpired to his 1040). Big deal! Sheesh these nuts will latch on to anything.