Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34871)	2/22/1999 2:08:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

What can be taken to a court, and what can be legitimately reported as an allegation, are two different things.

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34871)	2/22/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

I'd like to see where a judge anywhere in the country would accept a prosucution of this kind of a case; 20 years old with no evidence. Witness at the scene immediately after it happened, plus we've got Mrs. Broaddrick identifying Clinton as the perp in a line-up. And you say "no evidence"? Dude, you need to start dealing with reality. This is as much evidence as at any normal criminal trial. Sometimes people are convicted of murder with no dead body to be found. Generally they like to find the weapon. In this case, the tools of assault are the choppers in Clinton's mouth.