Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (2958)	2/22/1999 8:01:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Richard, we have some of the questions unnswered.....but the way I see...MG needs more time...time will tell all: Message 7895490 Was his question in which I answered the alst one only: Message 7896035 Message 7896485 Message 7907749 And my fictional post-talk at : Message 7907664 Chuca-triedtotake-a-step-backwards (2GOforwarddd) <<.. Since this is by conventional assay I don't understand why... 1) No takeover since 1997 base on Sinagua alone ? 2) Why no major financing since 1997 for MGAU... base on Sinagua alone ? BTW, can you tell me what are the Galleon Claims ? Are these the Sticklizard property ?? ..>> P.S.- We are talking what everyone says to me on my claims...you prrove the extraction and then...we will talk. I am a staker and so9 to spaek ...CLAIMER....Group Manager...I leave the extraction to the Desert Dirts...that is the Game Plan as I see it.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (2958)	2/22/1999 10:20:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5143

RIchard, On Sinagua: 1) What happened to the summer 1997 pilot plan. 2) Why no financing following the results announced on Sinagua in 1997? Since all grades were obtained through conventional fire assay and the results were explosive, it should have been very easy to obtain millions? 3) Why no takeover by Barrick or Newmont..or.. Again, the results were so impressive that they should have attracted somebody ? 4) With such exceptional results again with conventional SFA..why so little work was performed in the September 1997- December 1998 period. Why was the company spending precious time on other projects ? There are certainly valid answers to these questions...