Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DJ Byrne who wrote (53520)	2/22/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

DJ, thanks. Hold on to that check for the time being. <s> I work better hungry. PS There were some outstanding lines on this thread.

To: DJ Byrne who wrote (53520)	2/25/1999 12:03:00 AM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

Apologies to me are not necessary, I always understood that you and others were defending your position, and I do consider your apology to be sincere. However (ahem), I would rather have an explanation than an apology because there are certain matters that I (and others) have never understood about your (shareholders) position. I would like to lay a few of them on you and you can answer as you see fit, either by PM or on the thread. It's my opinion that it would be helpful if there could be some open discussion about what brought you ( the shareholders) to this point. 1. When information was posted on the thread, that was contrary to what you were being fed, did you in fact make any attempt to verify the information ? 2. Did you then or do you now, believe that there was a group of investors known as the cavalry who were supporting your efforts? 3. Did it ever occur to you that Riley and Pugs were responsible for the stock being halted ? By this I mean did it occur to you when they were placing daily calls to NASDAQ and the SEC, that it would bring scrutiny of the company's false press releases which could result in a halt? 4. Who do you believe lied to you, Morgan and Breton or Riley and Pugs or all of the above? 5. Were you ever intimidated about posting your reservations because you felt you would be ostracized by the other shareholders or dropped from the E-Mail list ? 6. When it was proved that Pugs was lying about certain matters, which he even admitted to, did you still continue to believe he was acting in your behalf ? Should you choose to answer by PM rather than on the thread, I will of course honor your privacy. I will not post your answers if that is your wish.

To: DJ Byrne who wrote (53520)	2/25/1999 9:59:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 55532

Thanks DJ!! That was very big of you. TG

To: DJ Byrne who wrote (53520)	11/14/1999 11:42:00 AM
From: tonto	Respond to of 55532

Tonto, s martin, TC, Tide Glider, TLW, MK and others...... It is definitely not beneath me not to apologize for most of my comments to all of you especially because of recent developments, right motives wrong stock. Please accept my apologies. Got to admit it though, the rhetoric sometimes filled in some rather boring moments. In one of my posts I stated to tonto that if I found out he was on the level I would send a check for dinner, probably had to do with the Morgan/Mork meeting. Please send address, it will not be construed as compensation.....(joke) dj-can't judge a stock by its press releases... and the responses DJ's classy post: siliconinvestor.com