Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (50497)	2/22/1999 4:42:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 1580703

Kevin - Re: " The only meaningful comparisons, however, will have to wait until AMD releases a mobile version of the K6-III. Then we can compare directly with Dixon." Why didn't AMD release a MOBILE K63 version today? Intel's Mobile Dixon has been out for a month ! Paul

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (50497)	2/22/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1580703

Re: " Use your head. Do you think it will generate more heat than the K6-233 MHz? Same package, same socket, worked just fine. Cooling is not the issue. Power consumption isn't really either, at least for the desktop market, which is what we've (apparently) been discussing. The issue is process technology. This may reflect a weakness in process technology, or it may be just a reflection of the need to increase power to supply the VASTLY greater number of transistors. I suspect it's a little of both. The only meaningful comparisons, however, will have to wait until AMD releases a mobile version of the K6-III. Then we can compare directly with Dixon." The Mobil K6-2 electrical spec shows a max case temp of 85C when consuming far less power compared the 65C for the K6-3. This isn't going into a mobile box any time soon. EP