SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (50530)2/22/1999 8:16:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1572719
 
<The problem here is that Intel is basing everything to a PII 233 and it shows the Dixon is only 16% faster.>

Then just do the math and scale the numbers again to a Pentium II 300 (Mobile Deschutes):

Pentium II 300 (Mobile Deschutes): 1.00 (originally 1.10)
Pentium II 300PE (Dixon): 1.05 (originally 1.16)

This is the closest to a "fair" comparison we can get. The Dixon at the same clock speed runs 5% faster than a mobile Deschutes on Winstone 99.

<If this is all Dixon can manage I suspect they will be toast.>

Like I said before, the reason behind the 256K of on-die L2 cache isn't performance, since 5% is hardly worth bragging about (except for AMD, I suppose). Rather, the on-die L2 cache allows Intel to do away with the bulky mobile Deschutes cartridge which included both processor and off-chip SRAM cache. Dixon's BGA package is less than a tenth of an inch in thickness, which is paper-thin, and weighs less than a nickel, according to:

developer.intel.com

Plus, Dixon's 1.6 volt power supply also helps tremendously in the mobile market. It's design advantages allows Intel to charge a pretty good price premium on the Dixon.

Meanwhile, AMD's K6-3 has to run at 2.4 volts in order to get to 400 MHz. You'll have a hard time convincing me that you can take the exact same desktop chip and drop the speed by only 50 MHz while dropping the core voltage down to 2.0 volts.

Tenchusatsu



To: kash johal who wrote (50530)2/22/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572719
 
Kash - Re: "If this is all Dixon can manage I suspect they will be toast. "

At 27 watts, the K63 bowser IS TOAST !

Paul