Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MacCoy who wrote (35124)	2/23/1999 6:56:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Duh?... to win a lawsuit, and not have his reputation tarnished...

To: MacCoy who wrote (35124)	2/23/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Do you have any motive at all why Clinton might commit this Jones, and by extension Starr, Obstruction of Justice crime? I really don't.>> Socially unacceptable, self gratification; followed by fear of exposure, followed by denial, followed by embarrassment and frustration, followed by a cover up of all of the above including lying and obstruction. On the basis of what would I draw this conclusion: 1. 5 of the probably hundreds of Does coming forward to expose his character of using women in this way. 2. They were women from within his own camp. 3. He lied to you and me eye ball to eye ball in this regard and did it very, very well. He asked for our support in the process. To me that was contingent on his sincerity being born out. For you it apparently doesn't matter. 4. His testimony at all times was obviously designed to dodge the issues (deceit and manipulation) not deal with them. 5. There are 6 billion people on this planet. I see no reason to lend trust or confidence in this one that has been so exposed as a deceitful, manipulation, liar. Mac, I'm not buying this pretense that you can't find cause or method in clinton. Some people are still denying he did any thing, some are saying so what they don't care. You? You are saying you can't see any substance to the charges. Come clean. Why are you so dependent on bc that you would sacrifice all principle for his support. If you are so inclined, there are 6 billion others worthy of your consideration. brees