Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MacCoy who wrote (35164)	2/23/1999 9:08:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

1. Yes, I think he exposed himself, just as she said. 2. One of the relevant Supreme Court cases determined that a threat, whether or not acted upon, was sufficient to prove damages, because of its coercive power. I think that it is possible, although uncertain, that he did things to pressure her or show his displeasure, even if it wasn't too severe as a practical matter. 3. The pattern that was being sought was whether refusing or accepting his advances affected one's career. Under that scenario, it may be irrelevant to say that he was "merely getting a job for a former lover", since it still amounts to favoritism over other employees based upon sexual service.