SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mark garner who wrote (39186)2/23/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: William Brotherson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50264
 
OK Mark,

NO!!

Potential yes, in fact I have tried FNET as my provider but the connection in Idaho was very poor and it just did not work out for me. But to say the same potential, that is wrong, with the amount of overhead being the major difference. DGIV will be mostly profit without all of the maintainance that running your own ISP brings with it.

As I said before, to me, they are both win win, but I also like apples and oranges, but I would not compare the taste to either.

I guess I'll have to give Helen a call and see if anything has changed that I am not aware of.

Take care

wb



To: mark garner who wrote (39186)2/23/1999 1:27:00 PM
From: woody  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50264
 
Mark, we should be discussing DGIV not FTEL. But I agree, that FNET will provide the "minutes" and FTEL the hardware. Im just not sure what a shareholder in FTEL receives from FNET, other than some potential "internal" sales as well as a reduction in debt associated with deployment of the network. FNET will certainly help FTELs share price but how much Im not sure. Dgivs share price will move based on the contracts i.e (minutes) that they can sign up. Again, I like both stocks...

Im surprised that FTEL didnt get a bigger pop on the news.