Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7667)	2/23/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10072

Nadine/all, it strikes me as funny that if it weren't for the poster this thread tries to exclude, there would be almost nothing posted here most of the time. <G> Gottfried

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7667)	2/23/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: BeachBum	Respond to of 10072

Nadine... The point I was trying to make is KP's last post to me was an exaggeration, he tried to make the point IOM would go broke selling drives at are slightly below costs to OEM's, remember IT's THE DISKS STUPID ( not you Nadine ). If anyone did their DD they would know that. Anyway the chart doesn't look too good right now, I'll wait till it turns positive to buy my trading shares back. Maybe I'll disappear until then because this thread has turned into a public type chat thread than one that discusses stocks, but then again that's what the bears want. I'm not against hearing both sides of the argument as long as it sounds logical and states facts and not some spin put on by either the bears are bulls. At least most bulls here admit they are bulls and have a position, I always question people who post on these threads and claim not to have a position one way or the other in the stock. BB ^-^-