Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (2180)	2/23/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2390

Of course they're hypocritical. What did you expect, logical consistency from gator? Come on, get real. Haven't you noticed all the liberals and feminists who dumped on Clarence Thomas for purportedly putting a pubic hair on the coke can of a subordinate and declared him evil and totally barred from any right to hold high government office (even though, note well, no actual sex was ever involved or alleged) suddenly changing their tune when it was a guy they supported who had actual sex with a subordinate? They turned tail so fast their heads are still spinning. That's the main problem in debating issues with the neo-liberal philosophy -- it is almost intentionally logically inconsistent and without any core principles. It is pure expediency. That mean there is nothing to debate about, since any rational debate must come down to some agreement on principles--otherwise it's simply all opinion, and what's the point?