Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (7692)	2/23/1999 5:56:00 PM
From: Katherine Derbyshire	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10921

I think the post you were looking for was 3324. Still, a suggestion that one is using the completely legal tactic of shorting a stock hardly meets my definition of a "personal attack." I've been called a parasite. (Now that's a personal attack!) I've been accused of trying to talk stocks down. I've been accused of an inability to add. My opinion is that someone who is so unsure of his investment rationale that he resorts to attacks on people who disagree with him is not someone who I would view as a credible source for financial advice. I'm also of the opinion that someone who trusts an anonymous voice on the Internet over his own analysis probably should not be managing large sums of money without assistance. Now can we all move on, please? Katherine

To: Jess Beltz who wrote (7692)	2/28/1999 7:45:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10921

Jess and Curly, I think it is time to burry the hatchets> I consider both of you good "cyberfriends" even though I had past disagreement with both. Maybe we should refrain in these posts from questioning people's motives and rather question their premises. It is also a folly to believe that in stock with relatively broad participation, comments on SI have any influence on the price of stock, one way or the other. I believe that part of the animosity between the bulls and the bears in any issue is due to the faulty assumption, IMHO, that a bearish post can influence the price, or vice versa. I think both of you have important contributions to make, and thus some peace treaty should be agreed upon. Good luck to both of you. Zeev PS, short term, I am still bullish on CYMI, (and jumped in last week), but I fear the "Spring Relapse" and the fact that the SOX has already broken down. Thus, my finger is on the "jettison" button on the ready if we break important support one or two bucks from where we closed Friday.