Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (1013)	2/23/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: Midas	Respond to of 5821

Terry: "Heli-drilling to 150 meters (to scissor #99-1) is much cheaper than putting in any winter road--the "stall" reasons appear bogus to me. Drill confirm then build access roads." Flying in to drill one hole won't resolve anything whether you hit high- or low-grade mineralization! The location (and type) of mineralization in hole 99-1 and the previous holes is exactly what one expects for a nickle sulfide-bearing intrusion. Furthermore, the area clearly has the potential for higher grade mineralization. Only a sustained drilling program (and therefore building an access road) will permit Nuinsco to follow the mineralization wherever it leads. Even if the mineralization is only a few hundred metres wide as suggested by the geophysics, the mag and I.P. anomalies have great strike lengths and may ultimately lead to another Ovoid etc. Midas

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (1013)	2/23/1999 10:07:00 PM
From: Tom Cat	Respond to of 5821

Hi Terry, Thank you for your feedback (it is not everyday that you get a real geo on the threads). One more question, L10+00, 100 meters away from from L11+00, shows an IP that crosses way beyond the mag anomaly,it seem logical to me that NWI will drill next at L10+50 and another at L10+00 and about 1+00E. Assuming that they find the same good stuff at these levels, we would be looking at a lens the size of 200m by 100m, someone implied that VB ovoid was no larger than 100X100 and yet proved a huge tonnage (30MT?), how would this differ from DFR ?(now to be fair to everyone, we have to agree that we know how deep this animal is, right) TC

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (1013)	2/28/1999 12:58:00 AM
From: Tom Cat	Respond to of 5821

Hi Terry, regarding your post from Feb/23, I had a chance to analyze in detail this weekend, you posted: <use the plan map with the mag and IP anomalies to place anomaly bars on Section 11+00 N. Note that the IP anomaly as picked by Nuinsco extends to about 1+10W, while their mag anomaly extends to about 0+75W. Note #99-1 mineralization extends from about 1+10W to about 1+60W. Note that the IP/Mag anomaly bars DO NOT occur over the mineralization. Neither did the Input anomalies. > I can see what you mean about that the mineralization is where is not supposed to be....it does not coincide with he mag or IP, in fact is drifting away from the reference (00) position towards the southwest....but...I am now even more confused, why wouldn't the IP and mag pick the mineralized gabbro that seems to be around 1+75W? and show where there is low grade Ni%?, would it be possible that the high grade feeder is actually way south, where the secondary mag anomaly shows? Your comments are appreciated? TC