Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Starpoint Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: william bell who wrote (2143)	2/23/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: norm roberts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2378

blah,blah ,blah.this story is a bit long in the tooth if you don't mind me saying so.when were these trades made'; was it 1896.oops 1996. or 1997.has it taken this long to find this simple thing out about shady trades etc.wow i am impressed with management. and to think that the trading public out there, in netstown,for one minute thought the v.s.e or a.s.e is realy on the investors side.wow i am surprised that is the case.NOT NOT NOT.or could it be thatlittle starpoint needs to come up with a promo.like big payoff from litigation,buy now before the trillions of shares are all gone. OH GIVE ME A BREAK.NRR

To: william bell who wrote (2143)	2/24/1999 4:37:00 PM
From: john mcknight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2378

Hi Bill, Good to see management sticking to their guns, guess they must be sure of their facts and the information in the report, if the allegations are proven in coust it sure will upset things for some others out there , they've had their own way in the market for years ,however once a precedent is set... it's a bit like the heavyweight who is unbeaten until he's knocked out then the others realise it can be done and life from then on in is not quite as easy for him ,makes you think and might make others think as well.... Regards