Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LINUX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1094)	2/23/1999 10:01:00 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2615

E. To see how good a SW1600 is and understand why it is claimed to be a step and a half in technology, well this jpeg shows it all. This jpeg is 329111 bytes. home.earthlink.net I've looked at 5x7 xterms on several 21" 20" and 17" monitors. Only a 21" Cornerstone operating at 1800x1400 was somewhat close in sharpness. The jpeg togetm.jpg shows side by side a photo of and xterm with a 5x7 font. The SW1600 has a resolution of 1600x1024 and the Hitachi 21" monitor was operating at a resolution of 1600x1200. The 5x7 xterm on the Hitachi is a shade under 4" wide while the 5x7 xterm on the SW1600 is 3 7/8" This side by side comparison gives an idea of the incredable sharpness of the SW1600. There is a clear plastic scale shown in each photo to assist in gaging the screen shots. Tom Watson tosiwme