Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Veronex Technologies Inc. (VXTK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TEDennis who wrote (577)	2/23/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 684

Ted............. Did you meet this guy Hite? Does he really believe he is helping his company by behaving so paranoid? Obviously you have many disagreements as to the claims of the company. But you haven't in any way said the company was a scam. If I am not mistaken per your review, you have merely stated that you think many of the company's claims are exaggerated? Now the exaggeration of product claims in an effort to generate share holder interest does strike me as an attempt at manipulation of share price. I hope you or others have reported these exaggerations to the SEC as you deemed necessary. Sometimes it seems to me that companies will go to any extremes to generate share holder interest. But unfortunately many shareholders have grown wiser (at least I hope) to newsletters that write great reports of companies and then trade the free shares they just received into the subsequent runs that these reports generate for the reported companies. That has been the case with many of WSRG's pumps, but unfortunately for WSRG and the free shares they received from GTCI, the report-pump-sell scheme didn't materialize, and trading volume for GTCI has been dwindling. Now what any of this has to do with VXTK, I'm not sure...other than that their seem to be a lot of similar bed fellows... I was intrigued that Hite didn't respond in any way to your review of VXTK's product. Did he, therefore, accuse you too of having some hidden agenda? Personally, I find his whole escapade kind of silly and certainly not dignified for someone purportedly his age. I especially find his paranoid ranting and raving and ironically blasphemous statements about anyone's agenda and anyone's supposed position in this company counterproductive as to attract investor interest in Veronex. Apparently, based on the volume of shares traded, it seems like most people reading, at least, this board would agree, especially since trading interest in Hite's company has been waning even more. Anyway....funny how he's so eager to find everyone's identity, whereas if he really had a case, he'd follow due process and proceed by challenging SI....Guess he knows he doesn't have a case....and would be only opening himself up to countersuits of libel. Or, in other words, John Stark knows who I am. Therefore, this paranoid joker is only embarrassing himself and his company by his continued presence on this thread or any other thread on SI. (Plus Josef makes a very good point that Hite should put a disclaimer at the bottom of every one of his posts stating his position in VXTK ,especially since I don't believe "lurkers" have access to profile info). Finally, I'd be interested to see how many shares Hite unloaded when this company was previously pumped up to 16.... Sincerely, ztect

To: TEDennis who wrote (577)	2/23/1999 10:29:00 PM
From: Bobcat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 684

Some of this requested info may be considered trade secrets, but on the other hand there is such a thing as the "Freedom of Information Act" whereby the Federal Government would require info to be released and they would decide what was a trade secret and what was not. And just because this company is small and nearly unheard of would not release it from the requirements of that act. So you just can not use that for an excuse to avoid providing info just because it is not music to your ears. Sometimes the truth hurts.

To: TEDennis who wrote (577)	2/23/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: David A. Hite	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 684

Interesting comments from the FBN contingent. Terry, you were at Veronex and have signed a non-disclosure agreement. However, your questions are not appropriate since you have actually had a demonstration of the I\|Nova System. Terry, you really need to consider reading the news release more closely. Why the new word games Terry? You were at the technology center, received a complete demonstration and had every opportunity to ask any and all questions. You know the non-disclosure rules and if you want to come back out to get more information about the I\|Nova System, then call and make the arrangements.