SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (50792)2/24/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1572778
 
Yousef,
RE:"Re: "Yes ... we know that Intel has better process technology
than AMD."

Jim, I'm glad that you are finally starting to "get it" ... Now, if we
can just get you out of the back of Jerry's "Limo". Jim, why do you
think
that AMD had to "jack up" the voltage on the K6-3 ?? Will this
give any
sort of "reliability" problems ?? ... What do the "chicken bones""...

I know why AMD had to jack up the voltage on the K6-III and I would like to ask you about it but I don't think it's a good idea to post it on a public BB. I alluded to it on the this thread and to my surprise, someone picked right up on it. I'll put it too you this way, the voltage could be dropped shortly.

As far as the process technology issue. You like to remind me of the quick and dirty way to compare proccess'. I am sure you won't forget about design rules either. Reliability problems? Why? The K6-2-400 is rated to run at 2.5v and the K6-233 ran at 3.2 and 3.3v.