SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (31685)2/23/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I agree with you in the abstract. In actual fact, I would rather pay someone else to do the slaughtering of domestic animals, and benefit from the largess of hunters of wild animals. Slaughtering animals is dirty, messy, smelly, and requires a lot of space to do right - mammals, anyway. I don't particularly want to have to deal with hundreds of pounds of meat all by myself, either.



To: Dayuhan who wrote (31685)2/24/1999 7:02:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Or, to return to our favorite subject, people who like babies but not the process by which they are created. Natural living is wonderful, except it takes up so damned much time that we have few novels or movies of our ancestor's simple natural lives made by them, but fiction that cannot show the outright agony of losing a crop to insects or storms or those darling deer and being hungry next winter, losing children perhaps, as a result. I think vegetarians are more moral than the rest of us. But its only a partial attempt to purify the means of life from cruelty and environmental destruction. Nature is cruel, inexorable, unforgiving, uncaring, ignorant armies clashing by night. Persons choosing to live with it requires arms length struggle. A animal lover who chose to avoid the drugs based on animal exploitation to save his child from death would go too far in his hopeless quest I think.