Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald R. Lampton who wrote (22763)	2/24/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

I don't know, what if they are? Are they going to appeal on grounds of Jackson rolling his eyes? On grounds of incompetent representation? Because Boies was mean to some "relatively junior executives"? Or is this like B'rer Rabbit's "Don't throw me into the briar patch" and Bill really wants Microsoft busted up? What do they gain by this show? Versus simply saying the government hasn't proven its case, and leaving it at that? I'm sure somebody on "How High" has some cool explanation for this all. Clever chess player Bill sacrificing his queen or something. Maybe local antitrust expert Reggie could explain it. As a hearts and minds guy, also following the case for entertainment purposes, it's both a mystery and a wonder. Cheers, Dan.