Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.L. Turner who wrote (4062)	2/24/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: John Mansfield	Respond to of 9818

right. Some 90% of the posts on c.s.y2k are not very interesting; but the 10% are a true gold mine for new ideas and opinions on Y2k! Many current ideas FIRST turn up on c.s.y2k. John

To: J.L. Turner who wrote (4062)	2/24/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

Now jlt are you referring to my "invitation" to 'ol Mitch Ratcliffe to come out and play "I ain't no economist but,..." with me. I thought it was issued in the best tradition of the school yard. I insulted his smarts, manhood and editing skills. We'll see if he takes a swing. After today's news it might be hard for him to write installment number three of that three part rant. I don't doubt for a minute that he's revising number three as we speak to dismantle that Senate report. My suspicion is that it will make him more shrill in his insistence that by god nothing bad will happen...and once all those y2k expenses are over and done with and those monies placed back into production why we can expect growth in Year 2000...or whatever parrot-boy argument that all was about.