Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (14638)	2/24/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: Grateful Reaper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22810

Dr. Meade, yes, the NR mentioned NPEC's direction and activities and that's good. But the main purpose of the NR was to announce the appointment of the new officers, a significant corporate event. Aren't you curious as to the background of these new officers? Don't you see the relevance? Don't you believe shareholders have a right to this information, without having to individually contact IR? Can you imagine Intel or any other well-known company announcing the appointment of a new president and listing his/her background with such brevity as "owned several companies?" Why should NPEC be any different? They can use all the credibility they can get and a more detailed PR would have helped. I'm trying to keep an open mind. If you or anyone else can think of some strategic reason for not including specifics on the new officers' backgrounds, I'd love to hear it. Would a PR with a few more words have cost that much more? Or, was it just poor writing by Dave.